Punctuation is Powerful

A couple of months ago we wrote about the serial comma — the last comma in a list — and showed how its presence could clarify the meaning of an otherwise ambiguous sentence. In a broader sense, clarity is the purpose of all punctuation. When we read a page of text, punctuation sets the pace, identifies asides, and eases the reader’s path towards an understanding of the writer’s intents.

There’s no doubt that the placement of various punctuation marks can change the meaning of a sentence. Here’s an example of the impact of a misplaced comma, in a story that some purport to be true, but which the good folks at Snopes.com demonstrate to be apocryphal. Continue reading

Everybody’s a Maven

As someone with more than a passing interest in the art of writing, I subscribe to several feeds and email newsletters on the subject. One of the best is Daily Writing Tips. Today’s edition, entitled 20 Synonyms for Expert was especially interesting, as it set me straight on the derivation of a few words whose origins surprised me. I always assumed, for example, that doyen was borrowed from Yiddish, because that’s the way it sounds. Not so: it’s “from the Middle French word meaning ‘leader of ten,’ stemming from the Latin term decanus, and ultimately from the Greek term dekanos, both with the same meaning.” I felt a bit better when the explanation continued with “Carries a connotation similar to that of connoisseur or maven.Continue reading

Et tu, Will Shortz?

Four of the clues in today’s New York Times crossword read “See 37-Across.” The clue to 37-Across is “Grammatical infelicity… or what 17-, 23-, 48-, or 60-Across is?” The answers to those clues are:

  • to divorce
  • to pull up stakes
  • to go fifty fifty
  • to shatter

Each of those infinitives refers to a kind of split, so the “grammatical infelicity” referred to by Times Puzzle Editor Will Shortz is the unjustly maligned split infinitive. Continue reading